In a former workplace, the reaction to sky-falling was really interesting. In this workplace, if the problem was important enough, every course of action must be taken. Why would you not try everything since this is an important problem? If you solve the problem by doing 15 things and don't know really which one fixed it, that was considered a victory.

I find this troubling, because I don't agree with it, and because I suspect that my disagreement is wrong, and that the health of the company was actually better served by fixing the sky first.

What would Rands do?